Articles online

Coarse and Fine Particulate Matter Components of Wildland Fire Smoke at Devils Postpile National Monument, California, USA

Category: Aerosol and Atmospheric Chemistry

Volume: 19 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1463-1470
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2019.04.0219

Export Citation:  RIS | BibTeX

Donald Schweizer 1,2, Ricardo Cisneros2, Monica Buhler3

  • 1 USDA Forest Service, Bishop, CA 93514, USA
  • 2 University of California, Merced, CA 95343, USA
  • 3 Devils Postpile National Monument, Mammoth Lakes, CA 93546, USA


  • Smoke increased both fine and coarse components of particulate matter.
  • Fine to coarse particulate matter median ratios were 1.37 without and .47 with smoke.
  • Fine particulate matter dominated on days with the highest levels of smoke.
  • Fine to coarse particulate matter ratios during all smoke days varied from 0.03–2.3.


Fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10) particulate matter were monitored during the summer and fall of 2018 at Devils Postpile National Monument, California, USA. This remote site, located in the Sierra Nevada, was downwind of a number of wildland fires that were burning in California. The coarse (PM2.5-10) and the fine (PM2.5) fractions of the PM in the wildland fire smoke showed median PM2.5-10/PM2.5 ratios of .47 and 1.37 during periods with and without smoke, respectively. The concentrations at ground level were significantly (p < 0.001) higher during the periods with smoke for both the PM2.5-10 (10.3 µg m–3) and the PM2.5 (35.3 µg m–3), although the PM2.5 contributed most of the increase. These concentrations suggest that the fire size and intensity along with the distance and transport of smoke determine the exposure risk to humans. Current exposure estimates obtained via modeling and emission estimates may misrepresent ground-level concentrations due to a lack of understanding of the aerosol distribution in an aging wildland fire smoke plume.


PM2.5 PM10 Wilderness air quality Emission characterization

Related Article

Relieved Air Pollution Enhanced Urban Heat Island Intensity in Yangtze River Delta, China

Hao Wu, Tijian Wang , Qin’geng Wang , Nicole Riemer, Yang Cao, Chong Liu, Chaoqun Ma, Xiaodong Xie