Articles online

Fluorescent Bioaerosol Particles Resulting from Human Occupancy with and Without Respirators

Category: Bioaerosols

Volume: 17 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 198-208
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0400
PDF | Supplemental material | RIS | BibTeX

Caijia Xu1, Chang-Yu Wu2, Maosheng Yao 1

  • 1 State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • 2 Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, Engineering School of Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA


Breath-borne bioaerosols of 1.93 ± 1.95× 105 particles m–3 were shown to peak at 1.5 µm.
An average emission rate of 2.1 × 106 fluorescent particles person–1 hour–1 was observed.
Bioaerosol emission from exhaled breath accounted for about 6% increase in studied room.
Bioaerosol shielding efficiencies from human breath by respirator depend on the facial fit.


Airborne transmission of pathogenic aerosols via human breath plays a major role in infectious disease outbreaks in indoor environments. Yet, their bioaerosol emission profiles are still not well quantified. Here, we first studied bioaerosol emission rates of human exhaled breath from 12 healthy subjects, and then evaluated the bioaerosol emissions when wearing two different respirators “Doctor masks” and N95 in a controlled environment (27 m3) using a bioaerosol sensor-ultraviolet aerodynamic particle spectrometer (UV-APS). The human bioaerosol contribution was further confirmed through classroom observation. The results showed that there was a peak around 1.5 µm for the fluorescent particles emitted from humans’ breath. For the controlled environment, the presence of 5 people without wearing masks increased bioaerosol concentration by 107% within 30 min at an average emission rate of 8.4 × 105 fluorescent particles person–1 hour–1 resulting from the occupancy. When wearing N95 masks or “Doctor masks”, bioaerosol increases were observed to be 81% or 31% for the controlled environment, respectively, lower compared to those without masks. In-classroom observation also showed a fluorescent particle concentration increase of about 50%. In all experiments, we observed a decline in PM number concentration. Bioaerosol emission from exhaled breath was calculated to account for about 17% of the increase in the controlled environment. The results here suggest the need for re-evaluating microbial aerosol exposure risks for medical sites that demand high levels of hygiene even while wearing a respirator.


Bioaerosols Exhaled breath Respiratory masks Shielding efficiencies Controlled environment

Related Article

Assessment of Indoor Bioaerosols in Public Spaces by Real-Time Measured Airborne Particles

Hsiao-Lin Huang , Mei-Kuei Lee, Hao-Wun Shih
Volume: 17 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2276-2288
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.02.0089

Fungal Bioaerosol Exposure and its Effects on the Health of Mushroom and Vegetable Farm Workers in Taiwan

Yenni Gustiani Tarigan, Ruey-Yu Chen, Hsiu-Chen Lin, Chia-Yi Jung, Kraiwuth Kallawicha, Ta-Pang Chang, Po-Chen Hung, Chih-Yong Chen, Hsing Jasmine Chao
Volume: 17 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2064-2075
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.09.0401
PDF | Supplemental material

Ambient Fungal Spore Concentration in a Subtropical Metropolis: Temporal Distributions and Meteorological Determinants

Kraiwuth Kallawicha, Yi-Chen Chen, H. Jasmine Chao, Wei-Chiang Shen, Bing-Yu Chen, Yu-Chen Chuan, Yue Leon Guo
Volume: 17 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2051-2063
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.10.0450