Articles online

Physiological Responses to Acute Airborne Particle Exposure during Maximal Aerobic Power

Category: Air Pollution and Health Effects

Volume: 16 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1922-1930
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0208
PDF | RIS | BibTeX

Giorgio Buonanno 1,2, Luca Stabile1, Daniela Lecce3, Angelo Rodio3, Fernanda C. Fuoco1

  • 1 Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, via G. di Biasio 43, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy
  • 2 Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
  • 3 Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health - University of Cassino and Southern Lazio - Via Sant'Angelo in TH snc - Campus Folcara, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy


We measured physiological effects of airborne particle exposure in athletes.
Intensity exercise close to maximal aerobic capacity was considered.
Particles were generated through incense-burning indoor phenomena.
Statistically significant differences were found between high and low scenarios.
No differences were measured in terms of exhaled nitric oxide.


The effect of the exposure to airborne particles on the physical performances achieved by athletes was investigated. Respiratory and cardiovascular parameters of nine subjects (volunteers, regularly performing physical activity) were measured during their high-intensity exercise performed indoor on a cycle ergometer. A steady-state concentration of airborne particles was generated through incense burning.

Two different particle exposure scenarios were tested: low (no source in operation) and high exposure (particle generation from incense burning phenomena). Alveolar-deposited surface area doses received by subjects during low and high exposure tests were measured equal to 22.7 ± 8.58 and 1.18 ± 0.22 × 103 mm2, respectively.

Oxygen uptake at the peak of the physical activity resulted statistically higher during high exposure tests, whereas lower peak heart rate values were measured for such scenario.

In terms of mechanical efficiency, a higher peak metabolic power was recognized for subjects performing tests in high exposure conditions: results were statistically different (about 1%) with respect to low exposure tests. On the other hand, measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (parameter associated to airway inflammations) performed during the tests showed no significant differences between the two exposure scenarios.


Air pollution Physical exercise Airborne particle exposure Oxygen consumption Exhaled nitric oxide

Related Article

Long-term Multiple Chemical Exposure Assessment for a Thin Film Transistor Liquid Crystal Display (TFT-LCD) Industry

Ying-Fang Wang, Shih-Min Wang, Yu-Chieh Kuo, Chungsik Yoon, Ya-Fen Wang, Perng-Jy Tsai
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.08.0299

PM2.5 Meets Blood: in vivo Damages and Immune Defense

Xiangyu Zhang, Jingjing Kang, Haoxuan Chen, Maosheng Yao , Jinglin Wang
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.05.0167

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) at High Mountain Site in North China: Concentration, Source and Health Risk Assessment

Jing Liu, Yan Wang, Peng-Hui Li , You-Ping Shou , Tao Li, Min-Min Yang, Lei Wang, Jun-Jie Yue, Xian-Liang Yi, Li-Qiong Guo
Accepted Manuscripts
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.08.0288

PM2.5-Bound PAHs in Indoor and Outdoor of Hotels in Urban and Suburban of Jinan, China: Concentrations, Sources, and Health Risk Impacts

Yanyan Li, Lingxiao Yang , Xiangfeng Chen, Ying Gao, Pan Jiang, Junmei Zhang, Hao Yu, Wenxing Wang
Volume: 17 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2463-2473
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2017.08.0286