OPEN ACCESS

Articles online

Numerical Simulation of Airflow Structure and Dust Emissions behind Porous Fences Used to Shelter Open Storage Piles

Category: Articles

Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1584-1592
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.11.0331
PDF | RIS | BibTeX

Chong-Fang Song1, Lin Peng 1, Jun-Ji Cao2, Ling Mu1, Hui-Ling Bai1, Xiao-Feng Liu1

  • 1 College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, 79 Yingze West Street, Taiyuan 030024, China
  • 2 Key Laboratory of Aerosol, SKLLQG, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an, 710075, China

Highlights

Applying surface shear stress to define calculation domain. 
Vector analyzes of the stress on each surface of a storage pile. 
Position that the maximum dust emission occurred vary with fence porosity. 
Simulations of shear stress avoiding distortion caused by vector offset.


Abstract

Porous fences can reduce dust emissions from storage piles in open storage yards, but their sheltering effect depends on the airflow structure around the pile, and the shear stress distribution on each surface. In this study, static flow fields were numerically simulated using the standard k-ε turbulence model; the shear stress characteristics and distribution on the windward side, flat-top surface, and leeward side of a typical prismatic material stack were analyzed. The distribution of the aerodynamic structure of each surface of the storage pile was determined according to the flow field data for fences of the porosities ε = 0, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6. The results indicated that at low porosities (ε = 0, 0.2) a recirculating flow appeared in the region between the fence and the pile. The shear force acted downward the windward slope, and the maximum dust emission occurred at two-thirds the height of the windward side, rather than at the top, as in unfenced conditions. Using the porous fence simulated in this study, shear stress on the windward side and the flat-top surface first decreased, then increased with increasing porosity; the lowest porosity values were 0.2 and 0.3, and the shear stress on the prismatic leeside changed little with increasing porosity. The numerical predictions indicated that a fence with porosity between 0.2 and 0.3 is optimal.

Keywords

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Open storage pile Dust emission Porous fence


Related Article

Critical Emissions from the Largest On-Road Transport Network in South Asia

Saroj Kumar Sahu , Gufran Beig, Neha Parkhi
Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 135-144
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.04.0137
PDF

Ambient Air Quality during Diwali Festival over Kolkata – A Mega-City in India

A. Chatterjee , C. Sarkar, A. Adak, U. Mukherjee, S.K. Ghosh, S. Raha
Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1133-1144
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.03.0062
PDF

Exploring the Variation between EC and BC in a Variety of Locations

Gbenga Oladoyin Salako, Philip K. Hopke , David D. Cohen, Bilkis A. Begum, Swapan K. Biswas, Gauri Girish Pandit, Yong-Sam Chung, Shamsiah Abd Rahman, Mohd Suhaimi Hamzah, Perry Davy, Andreas Markwitz, Dagva Shagjjamba, Sereeter Lodoysamba, Wanna Wimolwattanapun, Supamatthree Bunprapob
Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-7
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2011.09.0150
PDF
;