Articles online

A Low Pressure Drop Preseparator for Elimination of Particles Larger than 450 nm

Category: Articles

Volume: 11 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 487-496
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2011.05.0057
PDF | RIS | BibTeX

C. Asbach 1, H. Fissan1,2, H. Kaminski1, T.A.J. Kuhlbusch1,2, D.Y.H. Pui3, H. Shin3,4, H.G. Horn5, T. Hase6

  • 1 Institute of Energy and Environmental Technology (IUTA) e.V., 47229 Duisburg, Germany
  • 2 Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CeNIDE), 47057 Duisburg, Germany
  • 3 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
  • 4 now at: KOTEC, Bukgu, Ulsan 68337, Korea
  • 5 TSI GmbH, 52068 Aachen, Germany
  • 6 TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN 55126, USA


Measurement techniques which allow the detection of airborne nanoparticles are of great interest for e.g. exposure monitoring and quality control during nanoparticle production. An increasing number of commercial devices use a unipolar diffusion charger to charge the particles and determine the nanoparticle concentration and sometimes size. The analysis however may be biased by the presence of large particles. We therefore developed a preseparator that removes particles larger than 450 nm, i.e the minimum in the range of particle lung deposition curves, but only causes a low pressure drop. The preseparator uses a total flow rate of 2.5 L/min and consists of two stages. The first stage is a virtual impactor that removes particles larger than approximately 1 µm with a minor flow of 1 L/min. Particles above 450 nm are removed from the remaining 1.5 L/min in the cyclone of the second stage. The combination of a cyclone with a virtual impactor was shown to reduce the pressure drop of the preseparator from 8.1 to 5.6 kPa compared with a cyclone alone and improve the sharpness of the separation curve for cut-off diameters around 450 nm. Furthermore the virtual impactor extends the cleaning intervals of the preseparator, because large particles are no longer deposited in the cyclone. Eventually the preseparator was tested with an opposed flow diffusion charger and it was shown that particle charging is not affected by the pressure drop.


Cyclone Virtual impactor Diffusion charger Nanoparticle

Related Article

Critical Emissions from the Largest On-Road Transport Network in South Asia

Saroj Kumar Sahu , Gufran Beig, Neha Parkhi
Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 135-144
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.04.0137

Ambient Air Quality during Diwali Festival over Kolkata – A Mega-City in India

A. Chatterjee , C. Sarkar, A. Adak, U. Mukherjee, S.K. Ghosh, S. Raha
Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1133-1144
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.03.0062

Exploring the Variation between EC and BC in a Variety of Locations

Gbenga Oladoyin Salako, Philip K. Hopke , David D. Cohen, Bilkis A. Begum, Swapan K. Biswas, Gauri Girish Pandit, Yong-Sam Chung, Shamsiah Abd Rahman, Mohd Suhaimi Hamzah, Perry Davy, Andreas Markwitz, Dagva Shagjjamba, Sereeter Lodoysamba, Wanna Wimolwattanapun, Supamatthree Bunprapob
Volume: 12 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1-7
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2011.09.0150