OPEN ACCESS

Articles online

Eliminating Numerical Artifacts When Presenting Moving Center Sectional Aerosol Size Distributions

Category: Articles

Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 21-30
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2010.06.0046
PDF | RIS | BibTeX

Adam J. Mohs, Frank M. Bowman

  • Department of Chemical Engineering, University of North Dakota, 241 Centennial Drive Stop 7101, Grand Forks, ND 58202-7101, USA

Abstract

A number of atmospheric aerosol models use the moving center sectional (MCS) method to represent the aerosol size distribution. Distributions generated via MCS may exhibit numerical artifacts during condensational growth which appear as extraneous “pits” and “peaks” in the distribution. The use of remapping and smoothing methods to eliminate these numerical artifacts when presenting size distribution results is examined. Three remapping methods based on linear interpolation and two smoothing approaches were tested for use on output distributions from MCS simulations. Model predictions of condensational growth using the MCS method with and without smoothing and remapping are compared to an accurate analytical solution. Results indicate that one remapping method, the zero mass exclusive method, completely removed “pits” and “peaks” that form in high resolution, 48-section distributions, whereas the other potential correction methods only partially removed the artifacts. For lower resolution 12-section distributions, where pits and peaks are not formed, the remapping methods provide smaller improvements in how MCS distributions are depicted and smoothing approaches result in significant numerical diffusion.

Keywords

Condensational growth Modeling Artifact correction Aerosol size structure


Related Article

Critical Emissions from the Largest On-Road Transport Network in South Asia

Saroj Kumar Sahu , Gufran Beig, Neha Parkhi
Volume: 14 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 135-144
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2013.04.0137
PDF

Ambient Air Quality during Diwali Festival over Kolkata – A Mega-City in India

A. Chatterjee , C. Sarkar, A. Adak, U. Mukherjee, S.K. Ghosh, S. Raha
Volume: 13 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1133-1144
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2012.03.0062
PDF