About AAQR

Aims and Scope

Articles online
For contributors
Call for Papers
Guideline for the
Special Issue Proposal
Subscription
Information

Advertising

Contact Us
 
Search for  in   Search  Advanced search  

 

Volume 8, No. 4, December 2008, Pages 392-410 PDF(611 KB)  
doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2008.11.0051   

Comparison of Two Approaches to Modeling Atmospheric Aerosol Particle Size Distributions

Vladimír Ždímal1, Marek Brabec2,3, Zdeněk Wagner4

1 Laboratory of Aerosol Chemistry and Physics, Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the AS CR, v. v. i., Rozvojová 135, Praha 6, 165 02, Czech Republic
2 Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, National Institute of Public Health, Šrobárova 48, Praha 10, 100 42
3 Department of Nonlinear Modeling, Institute of Computer Science, Pod Vodárenskou věží 2, Praha 8, 182 07, Czech Republic
4 E. Hála Laboratory of Thermodynamics, Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals of the AS CR, v. v. i., Rozvojová 135, Praha 6, 165 02, Czech Republic

 

Abstract

 

This paper compares two approaches to modeling (smoothing) aerosol particle size distribution (particle counts for specified diameter intervals): i) the semiparametric approach based on a maximum likelihood fitting of lognormal (LN) mixtures at each time separately, followed by smoothing parameter tracks, ii) the nonparametric approach based on a kernel-like smoothing as an application of the gnostic theory of uncertain data. The specific advantages and disadvantages of both the semiparametric and nonparametric approaches are discussed and illustrated using real data containing a day-long time series of size spectra measurements.

 

 

Keywords: Particle size distribution; Lognormal mixture; Semiparametric modeling; Nonparametric modeling; Gnostic theory of uncertain data.

 

 

Copyright © 2009-2014 AAQR All right reserved.