About AAQR

Aims and Scope

Articles online
For contributors
Call for Papers
Guideline for the
Special Issue Proposal


Contact Us
Search for  in   Search  Advanced search  


Volume 15, No. 3, June 2015, Pages 1035-1044 PDF(1.11 MB)  
doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2014.09.0208   

Investigation of Antimicrobial Activity of Grapefruit Seed Extract and Its Application to Air Filters with Comparison to Propolis and Shiitake

Bangwoo Han1,2, Ji-Soo Kang1,2, Hak-Joon Kim1, Chang-Gyu Woo1, Yong-Jin Kim1

1 Environmental & Energy Systems Research Division, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, 156, Gajeongbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-343, Korea
2 Environment & Energy Mechanical Engineering, University of Science & Technology, 217 Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-333, Korea


  • Grapefruit seed extract showed the highest antimicrobial activity against S. aureus.
  • The superior inactivation performance of the GSE was due to its high wettability.
  • The application of GSE to an air filter is preferred due to its relatively low price.



Antimicrobial air filters using a new natural product agent, grapefruit seed extract (GSE) have been investigated for application in air purifiers or heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. The disk diffusion method was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of GSE, propolis, and shiitake against four bacteria: Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, Psedomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli. The inactivation of S. aureus was then investigated on air filters treated with two natural products, GSE and propolis (selected for comparison to GSE) using two test methods based on different deposition weights.
    GSE displayed the highest antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli of the three natural products tested by the disk diffusion method. Similar inactivation rates of 58–67% for GSE and propolis air filters were observed at a relatively low deposition weight of 94–98 μg/cm2 using the aerosol deposition method. However, the inactivation rate was considerably superior on the GSE air filter (~98%) compared to the propolis air filter (~75%) at deposition weights of 5000–8000 μg/cm2 using the film attachment method. The inactivation rate for both GSE and propolis air filters could be expressed as an exponential function [in the form of 1 – exp(–axb)] of the deposition weight per unit area of the natural product. The superior inactivation performance of the GSE air filter using the film attachment method was probably due to the high wettability of GSE for bacteria cultures, with a contact angle less than 20°. Therefore, GSE air filters will be more effective and economical than propolis air filters due to their high microbial activity and relatively low price.



Keywords: Natural product; Air filter; Bioaerosol; Antimicrobial; Inactivation.



Copyright © 2009-2014 AAQR All right reserved.