About AAQR

Aims and Scope

Articles online
For contributors
Call for Papers
Guideline for the
Special Issue Proposal
Subscription
Information

Advertising

Contact Us
 
Search for  in   Search  Advanced search  

 

Volume 16, No. 8, August 2016, Pages 1922-1930 PDF(405 KB)  
doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0208   

Physiological Responses to Acute Airborne Particle Exposure during Maximal Aerobic Power

Giorgio Buonanno1,2, Luca Stabile1, Daniela Lecce3, Angelo Rodio3, Fernanda C. Fuoco1

1 Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, via Di Biasio 43, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy
2 Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
3 Department of Human Sciences, Society and Health - University of Cassino and Southern Lazio - Via Sant'Angelo in TH snc - Campus Folcara, 03043 Cassino (FR), Italy

 

Highlights
  • We measured physiological effects of airborne particle exposure in athletes.
  • Intensity exercise close to maximal aerobic capacity was considered.
  • Particles were generated through incense-burning indoor phenomena.
  • Statistically significant differences were found between high and low scenarios.
  • No differences were measured in terms of exhaled nitric oxide.

Abstract

 

The effect of the exposure to airborne particles on the physical performances achieved by athletes was investigated. Respiratory and cardiovascular parameters of nine subjects (volunteers, regularly performing physical activity) were measured during their high-intensity exercise performed indoor on a cycle ergometer. A steady-state concentration of airborne particles was generated through incense burning.
    Two different particle exposure scenarios were tested: low (no source in operation) and high exposure (particle generation from incense burning phenomena). Alveolar-deposited surface area doses received by subjects during low and high exposure tests were measured equal to 22.7 ± 8.58 and 1.18 ± 0.22 × 103 mm2, respectively.
    Oxygen uptake at the peak of the physical activity resulted statistically higher during high exposure tests, whereas lower peak heart rate values were measured for such scenario.
    In terms of mechanical efficiency, a higher peak metabolic power was recognized for subjects performing tests in high exposure conditions: results were statistically different (about 1%) with respect to low exposure tests. On the other hand, measurements of exhaled nitric oxide (parameter associated to airway inflammations) performed during the tests showed no significant differences between the two exposure scenarios.

 

 

Keywords: Air pollution; Physical exercise; Airborne particle exposure; Oxygen consumption; Exhaled nitric oxide.

 

 

Copyright © 2009-2014 AAQR All right reserved.